|
Lecturer(s)
|
-
Havelková Kateřina, PhDr. Mgr. Ph.D.
-
Raabová Svatoslava, doc. Mgr. Art. ArtD.
-
Bureš Gejza, prof. Mgr.
-
Přibyl Lukáš, prof. Ing. arch.
-
Dostál Václav, prof. akad. mal. Ph.D.
-
Březina Jan, prof. akad. mal.
-
Hauptmann Jiří, prof. PhDr. CSc.
-
Klíma Vladimír, doc. akad. mal.
-
Miňová Olga, prof. MgA.
-
Malák Jiří, doc. MgA.
-
Rotenbornová Markéta, Mgr. Ph.D.
-
Antonová Kamila, akad. mal.
-
Klápště Miloslav, doc. akad. mal.
-
Jarý Oldřich, doc. MgA.
-
Sosvorová Jana, doc. Mgr. Ph.D.
|
|
Course content
|
The course focuses on the presentation and synthesis of the progress and results of the doctoral project. Doctoral students in their second year prepare a 30-minute scholarly presentation, supplemented with visual documentation, based on their research focus (dissertation). The presentation provides a comprehensive summary of the project's status, including an outline of the student's original and innovative approach, an overview of the literature used, and methodological procedures. Following the presentation, a 10-15 minute academic discussion takes place, allowing for critical reflection and defense of the proposed procedures and conclusions. Within the course, students develop the ability to: synthesize and present their research project systematically and in a visually clear manner; formulate and argue their own methodological and theoretical approaches; critically evaluate results and compare them with current international trends and practices in the field; connect theoretical insights with practical project outcomes; respond effectively to academic discussion and critical feedback. The course emphasizes theoretical grounding, scholarly argumentation, and the ability for critical interpretation, enabling doctoral students to systematically present their research and prepare for the defense of their dissertation theses.
|
|
Learning activities and teaching methods
|
E-learning, Discussion, Multimedia supported teaching, Students' self-study, Self-study of literature, Lecture, Lecture with visual aids
- Presentation preparation (report) (1-10)
- 8 hours per semester
- Individual project (40)
- 40 hours per semester
|
| prerequisite |
|---|
| Knowledge |
|---|
| recall the basic concepts of both general and field art history to repeat basic linguistic or expressive mimetic techniques, formulate and write down your thoughts in a coherent language unit independently search for theoretical support resources |
| Skills |
|---|
| interpret with the help of technical terms reproduced or otherwise presented examples of works of art, or visually figurative expressions, analyze the text and context of a work of art and art, to realize the values shaping one's own opinions in the field of artistic-aesthetic judgments, articulate, sophisticated and argued these courts to present to the partners in discussion reflect different opinions, critically consider them and confront them with their own opinions seek verified, systematic and respected sources of knowledge in the professional community and use them to enrich the personal and professional competence portfolio |
| Competences |
|---|
| N/A |
| N/A |
| learning outcomes |
|---|
| Knowledge |
|---|
| preparedness for the defense of the doctoral dissertation theses theoretical foundations and methodological approaches relevant to the doctoral project, the current state of knowledge and literature in their research field, principles of research argumentation and the structure of a scholarly presentation, possibilities and limitations of visualizing and interpreting the results of their research, the relationship between the theoretical framework, research methods, and practical outputs of the dissertation, ways of comparing and confronting their own results with international trends and analogies in other fields. |
| Skills |
|---|
| independently prepare an deliver a scholarly lecture on their own doctoral project, structure research findings and literature into a coherent and well-argued presentation, visualize and interpret the results of their own research, reflect on theoretical foundations and methodology in the context of the presented project, compare their own results with current international trends and analogies in other fields, conduct a professional discussion and defend their conclusions in a clear, articulate, and argument-based manner. |
| Competences |
|---|
| N/A |
| N/A |
| teaching methods |
|---|
| Knowledge |
|---|
| Self-study of literature |
| One-to-One tutorial |
| Skills |
|---|
| Individual study |
| One-to-One tutorial |
| Competences |
|---|
| Discussion |
| assessment methods |
|---|
| Knowledge |
|---|
| Individual presentation at a seminar |
| Continuous assessment |
| Combined exam |
| Skills |
|---|
| Seminar work |
| Competences |
|---|
| Individual presentation at a seminar |
|
Recommended literature
|
-
Collins, Hilary. Kreativní výzkum : teorie a praxe výzkumu v oblasti tvůrčích odvětví. První vydání. 2017. ISBN 978-80-7008-386-4.
-
COTHREN, Michael Watt a D'ALLEVA, Anne. Methods & theories of art history. .
-
ERTRAND, Stéphanie. Contemporary Curating, Artistic Reference and Public Reception: Reconsidering Inclusion, Transparency and Mediation in Exhibition Making Practice. 2021.
|